Effectiveness and safety of biological and target synthetic drugs treatment for psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PA) is a chronic inflammatory systemic arthritis that can result in loss of functional capacity and joint deformation. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness and safety of biological and target synthetic drugs for treating PA. METHODS: We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the use of Adalimumab, Etanercept, Infliximab, Golimumab, Secukinumab, Certolizumab Pegol and Tofacitinib in the main general databases and clinical trial registers databases. The primary outcomes were ACR 50, PsARC, and serious adverse events. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Network meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model and frequentist approach. The CINeMA software was used to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: We included 33 RCTs (n = 11,034). The results from the network meta-analysis for the ACR 50 at 6-months follow-up showed that all drugs were superior to placebo, with Secukinumab (high certainty of evidence), Infliximab (very low certainty of evidence) and Adalimumab (high certainty of evidence) ranking the highest. Regarding the PsARC (at 6-months follow-up), all drugs, except for Golimumab (very low certainty of evidence), were superior to placebo, with Etanercept (low certainty of evidence), Infliximab (low certainty of evidence) and Certolizumab Pegol (low certainty of evidence) being the most effective drugs. There were no significant differences in the risk of serious adverse events between the drugs and placebo. Golimumab (very low certainty of evidence), Secukinumab (low certainty of evidence), and Adalimumab (very low certainty of evidence) ranked the highest for safety. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, based on the balance between efficacy and safety, Secukinumab and Adalimumab may be the preferred options among the evaluated drugs for treating patients with PsA. However, caution is necessary when interpreting the safety findings, as they are supported by evidence of low to very low certainty. Consequently, the balance between benefits and potential risks may change as new safety evaluation studies become available. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42022315577.

Mapeamento de processo regulatório para aprovação de vacinas novas provenientes de desenvolvimento nacional

The availability of medicines to the population necessarily goes through a long regulatory path, where several steps must be fulfilled. In this scenario, ANVISA is the national regulatory agency responsible for establishing the regulations that companies, producers and developers must follow. The objective of this work is to map the different regulatory processes involved in the approval of a vaccine, a type of biological medicine, developed by companies or national research institutions. Therefore, there is a focus on local regulations that involves the regulatory approval of a vaccine. The steps from the initial stages of development of a vaccine are accompanied by processes that are guided by regulatory requirements, often complex and with different directions. Until final release to the public, the rules governing this release involve several approvals that must be strictly followed by developers. Thus, the scope of this work is to delineate the regulatory processes from the initial stages of development of a vaccine, through the distinct phases of clinical trials, to its final approval for distribution to the general public, contributing to a global comprehension by researchers of the regulatory process as a whole.

A disponibilização de medicamentos à população passa necessariamente por um longo caminho regulatório, onde várias etapas devem ser cumpridas. Neste cenário, a ANVISA é o órgão responsável pelo estabelecimento da regulamentação que as empresas, produtores e desenvolvedores devem seguir. O objetivo deste trabalho é mapear os diversos processos regulatórios envolvidos na aprovação de uma vacina, que é um tipo de medicamento biológico, desenvolvido por empresas ou instituições de pesquisa nacionais. Desta forma, foca-se na regulamentação local que envolve a aprovação regulatória de um produto biológico. Os passos desde as etapas iniciais de desenvolvimento de uma vacina são acompanhados de processos que são norteados por requisitos regulatórios, muitas vezes complexos e envolvendo diferentes direcionamentos. Até a disponibilização final ao público, as normativas que determinam essa liberação envolvem diversas aprovações que devem ser rigorosamente seguidas pelos desenvolvedores. Desta forma, o escopo deste trabalho é delinear os processos regulatórios desde as fases iniciais de desenvolvimento de uma vacina, passando pelas diferentes fases de ensaios clínicos, até a sua aprovação final para a disponibilização à população, contribuindo para fornecer uma compreensão global aos pesquisadores do processo regulatório como um todo.

Comparative price analysis of biological medicines: disparities generated by different pricing policies.

Introduction: Biological medicines have been assuming an important role among the therapeutic options for several diseases, however, due to their complex production process, the products obtained from this technology have a high added value and do not reach the purchasing power of most patients, which overwhelms the budget of health systems. With the development of biosimilars, which have reduced production costs, it is expected that access to biological medicines will become broader. However, in Brazil, the criteria for determining the price of biosimilars, unlike the generic policy in the country, do not foresee a price reduction due to the reduction of development costs. Objective: To understand the impact of the current model of economic regulation on the availability and access of these products in the country, based on a comparative analysis in selected countries, and identify trends that can help to expand the availability and access to biological medicines. Method: Quantitative and qualitative study, to identify the variation between the entry prices of biological medicines in Brazil and in selected countries, as well as the differences in the economic regulation policies established in these countries. Results: The results demonstrate that the current pricing model in Brazil has generated distortions in the prices of biosimilars in the market, which, consequently, makes it difficult for the population to access this category of products, in addition to allowing unsustainable market practices for the systems of public and private health in Brazil. It was also found that most of the analyzed countries, unlike Brazil, seek to harmonize the prices of different brands of the same molecule marketed in the country and with the international market, in addition to establishing incentive policies for indication and replacement by biosimilars, which expands the participation of biosimilars in the market significantly. Conclusion: Based on the data presented, it is concluded that it is essential to build a broader political and regulatory debate on the market for biologicals and biosimilars in the country to guarantee the access of the Brazilian population to more cost-effective technologies, generate a more competitive market and consequently contribute to the financial sustainability of health systems.

The whole experience of public hospital physicians from several specialties with biopharmaceutical effectiveness, safety, adverse drug reactions and interchangeability: A qualitative study.

Background: Although there is increasing support for biosimilar medicines by the Iraqi Ministry of Health (MOH), there is scarce information about whether physicians accept these medicines and support movement toward replacing reference medicines with their biosimilar counterparts. Objectives: The study objectives were to 1) explore in-depth the perceptions of Iraqi physicians working in public hospitals about the difference in effectiveness and safety between biosimilar medicines and their reference biological counterparts, 2) evaluate physicians' barriers to prescribing biosimilar medicines, 3) assess the adherence of physicians to the new pharmacovigilance regulations on reporting biopharmaceutical adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and 4) identify any barriers facing physicians to reporting biopharmaceutical- ADRs. Methods: This qualitative study included face-to-face and virtual semi-structured interviews involving physicians from different disciplines who had experience with biological or biosimilar medicines. The interviews were conducted between November 6, 2020, and February 7, 2021. Thematic analyses were used to analyze qualitative data generated from the interviews. Results: The study sample included 36 physicians (6 women and 30 men) from seven different specialties at ten governmental hospitals mainly in Baghdad, and one physician was from Mosul, Iraq. Because most physicians had insufficient experience with biosimilar medications and were not sure about their effectiveness, the majority were hesitant to prescribe them. Most physicians preferred to prescribe reference biological medicines initially. However, the initial prescribing and switching between a reference and counterpart biosimilar relies on its availability. They chose biosimilar medications that have been approved by the U.S. FDA or EMA. Most physicians were unaware about the new pharmacovigilance regulations to report adverse biopharmaceutical reactions. The physicians tended to underreport biopharmaceutical ADRs and believed that inadequate physician-pharmacist collaboration negatively impacts preventing and reporting ADRs. Conclusions: Medicine procurement in healthcare settings should focus on sustainably securing high-quality biopharmaceuticals rather than looking only at costs to enhance physician experience and patient clinical outcomes. Promoting documentation, monitoring, and physician-pharmacist collaboration is pivotal to prevent, monitor, and treat biopharmaceutical ADRs.

Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer Treatment: The Era of Biosimilars.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of trastuzumab as anti-HER2 therapy has markedly improved disease control and the survival rates of patients with HER2+ breast cancer. However, as trastuzumab is considered a complex molecule, the cost of production is usually elevated, which significantly affects health budgets and limits the treatment access for patients who live in underdeveloped countries. Recently, trastuzumab production has become more accessible and sustainable due to the patents' expiration, allowing biosimilar versions of trastuzumab to be developed. OBJECTIVE: Our main goal was to shed more light on the uses of biosimilars in breast cancer treatment, emphasizing trastuzumab. METHOD: An integrative search was carried out on the PubMed, Scielo, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases using the terms "biosimilar," "breast cancer," "monoclonal antibody," and "trastuzumab." The time range included scientific articles published from 2015 to 2021. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The bibliographic survey showed the complexities in biological medicine manufacturing and how the monoclonal antibody's therapy with trastuzumab improved the patients' life expectancy, revolutionizing HER2+ breast cancer treatment. Nonetheless, despite its benefits, trastuzumab generates certain restrictions, especially from the economic perspective. Trastuzumab biosimilars have high selectivity and rarely cause adverse effects compared to conventional chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study shows that trastuzumab biosimilars improve patients' accessibility to breast cancer treatment through a safe and effective therapy compared to the drug reference.

A framework for the use of biological medicines in the free state province, South Africa.

PURPOSE: The use of biological medicines (BM) has increased worldwide owing to their effectiveness in the treatment of many chronic diseases. However, in South Africa, access to BM remains limited, hence, there is a need to develop strategies that will enable timely access to BM by all patients who need them. OBJECTIVE: To develop a framework for the use of BM in South Africa. METHODS: Using a Delphi questionnaire that was developed by integration of the opinions of newly qualified doctors (<2 years practice), prescribing specialists, and patients using BM, a Delphi method was used to guide an experts' panel into consensus on the different opinions in the questionnaire, and from this, a framework for the use of BM was constructed. RESULTS: From the surveys, 76.2% of the newly qualified doctors and 91.7% of the prescribing specialists indicated that they had limited knowledge on the pharmacology of BM, and, respectively, 64.5% and 77.8% admitted that their knowledge on BM was not adequate for prescribing and taking care of patients on BM. Also, 58.3% and 75% of the prescribers indicated that the high cost and the tedious procurement process, respectively, were barriers of access to BM. The Delphi panel reached consensus after two rounds, and the resultant framework recommends that, appropriate use of BM requires establishing guidelines for the use of BM, increasing BM content in the medical training programs and information resources used by healthcare professionals, enacting drug regulations and drug policies that will increase availability of BM, offering appropriate patient information and public engagement. CONCLUSION: The lack of knowledge on BM by health professionals, together with the high cost and a complex procurement processes are the major impediment to access to BM. A framework for the use of BM in South Africa was successfully developed to address these and other challenges.

Uptake of biosimilars for TNF-α inhibitors adalimumab and etanercept following the best-value biological medicine initiative in Ireland.

Background There is over 10 years of clinical experience and evidence to show that biosimilar medicines can be used as safely and effectively in approved therapeutic indications as their originator biological medicines. In Ireland, biosimilar medicine uptake has been very slow, and savings to the health service will only be realised through fostering a competitive biological medicine market. Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the utilisation of biosimilars following a 'best-value biological' medicine initiative for adalimumab and etanercept in the Irish healthcare setting. Methods Data was extracted from the National High Tech claims database and High Tech ordering and management hub for the following drugs; adalimumab (Humira®, Amgevita®, Hulio®, Idacio®, and Imraldi®) and etanercept (Enbrel® and Benepali®). Main outcome measure: uptake of the best-value biological medicines. Results In June 2019, just over 90 patients had been initiated on, or switched to a best-value biological for adalimumab or etanercept. Over the next 12 months this increased to over 8500 patients. With the best-value biologicals accounting for approximately 50 % of market share in June 2020, the combined estimated savings and avoided costs are €22.7 million to date. The gain-share prescribing incentive has raised over €3.6 million for the specialties to invest back into patient care. Conclusion Against the background of a finite healthcare budget, this study shows that increasing use of biosimilars can create the financial savings and space to invest in new innovative therapies for the benefit of many patients.

Guidelines for the management of patients with Crohn's disease. Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gastroenterology and the Polish National Consultant in Gastroenterology.

This paper is an update of the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of the National Consultant for Gastroenterology and the Polish Society of Gastroenterology from 2012. It contains 46 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment, both pharmacological and surgical, of Crohn's disease in adults. The guidelines were developed by a group of experts appointed by the Polish Society of Gastroenterology and the National Consultant in the field of Gastroenterology. The methodology related to the GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality and strength of the available recommendations. The degree of expert support for the proposed statement, assessment of the quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendation was assessed on a 6-point Likert scale. Voting results, quality and strength ratings with comments are included with each statement.

Medication safety risks to be managed in national implementation of automatic substitution of biological medicines: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore relevant Finnish stakeholders' perceptions on the automatic substitution of biological medicines with particular focus on medication safety and issues that need to be considered to create an appropriate model for automatic biological product substitution. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. METHODS: Data were collected in semistructured individual (n=17), pair (n=7) and group (n=8) interviews (32 interviews, 62 participants) in 2018. Participants represented a wide range of stakeholders involved in the pharmacotherapy process: community pharmacists (n=8 interviews), authorities (n=7), prescribers (n=7), pharmaceutical industry and wholesalers (n=6), patients/customers (n=2), hospital pharmacists (n=1) and nurses (n=1). Inductive content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Benefits of automatic substitution were identified as cost savings, more patients receiving biological treatments and enhanced continuity of treatment. Six major risk categories were identified: (1) the patient's medication is interrupted or complicated temporarily or permanently, (2) the patient uses two products with the same active substance, (3) the traceability of the product is compromised, (4) the patient cannot get into healthcare in case of problems, (5) the patient does not receive substitution-related advice from a pharmacy and (6) the patient is distracted by the support material he/she receives. Several risk mitigation measures were commonly mentioned: medication and device counselling by pharmacists (n=23), infrequent substitution interval (n=15) and better knowledge on biosimilars among healthcare providers (n=13). CONCLUSION: Automatic substitution of biologics is associated with risks that should be prospectively managed before implementing the procedure. The substitution also introduces new tasks and communication needs to those involved in actual medication use process, particularly to community pharmacists who will be responsible for substitution and counselling the patients.

The INN global nomenclature of biological medicines: A continuous challenge.

Medicines are assigned International Nonproprietary Names (INN) by the World Health Organization (WHO), pursuing the aim to increase patient safety. Following scientific developments in drug discovery and biotechnology, the number of biological medicines is constantly growing and a surge in INN applications for them has been observed. Pharmacologically active biological substances have a complex structure and mechanism of action posing new challenges in selecting names that appropriately reflect such properties. As a consequence, existing nomenclature naming schemes may need to be revised and new ones developed. This review reports on the recently implemented policies for naming fusion proteins, monoclonal antibodies, advanced therapy substances that cover gene and cell therapy, virus-based therapies as well as vaccines and vaccine-like substances. Different approaches, based on the use of a one-word versus a two-word naming scheme, have been developed for different categories of biological substances highlighting a major and still not completely resolved issue, i.e. how to assign a name that is both informative, short and euphonic.

Medicamentos biosimilares en Colombia: una revisión desde el consumo informado / Biosimilar Medicines in Colombia: An Approach from the Informed Consumption / Medicamentos biossimilares na Colômbia: uma revisão desde o consumo informado

Resumen Introducción: este artículo presenta un análisis sobre medicamentos biosimilares en Colombia con miras a establecer si existe un consumo informado respecto de estos fármacos, teniendo en cuenta la calidad y cantidad de información que circula en relación con su disponibilidad y acceso económico (precios). Desarrollo: el tipo de estudio es cualitativo con un diseño documental a partir de la revisión en bases de datos como Pubmed, Scopus, Scielo, Vlex y Redalyc, bases de información de registros sanitarios de agencias reguladoras de medicamentos (FDA, EMA e Invima) y el Sistema de Información de Vademecum Med Informática. Uno de los biosimilares autorizados en FDA y cuatro de la EMA se encuentran registrados en el Invima; sin embargo, son más los biosimilares no autorizados ni en FDA ni en EMA que se encuentran registrados en el Invima, los cuales aún no aparecen con esta clasificación de biosimilares ni en la agencia reguladora colombiana ni en ningún otro medio oficial o comercial. De los medicamentos biológicos de referencia de estos biosimilares, 12 tienen control de precios y 7 han sido autorizados al menos una vez vía judicial a los usuarios del sistema. Conclusiones: si bien, la reglamentación ha sido de gran avance en relación con el acceso a biosimilares y, en consecuencia, a sus biológicos pioneros, el sistema aún tiene barreras jurídicas, de información, disponibilidad y acceso que dificultan la protección y efectividad del derecho a la salud de la población en términos de un consumo informado de estos.

Abstract Introduction: This article presents an analysis of biosimilar drugs in Colombia, aiming at critically analyzing whether the consumption of biosimilar drugs in Colombia is fully informed or if it rather is characterized for its lack of information. Informed consumption in the sense of taking into account the quality and quantity of the information circulating in relation to the availability and affordability (prices) of biosimilar drugs. Development: This is a qualitative documentary analysis, based on the review of databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, Scielo, Vlex and Redalyc, and sanitary databases of drugs regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA and the Colombian Invima) and the Vademecum Med Informatica. One of the biosimilars authorized by FDA and four of those by EMA were also registered before by the Invima. However, the number of Invima authorized biosimilars is higher than that authorized by FDA and EMA. It is also important to highlight the fact that any biosimilar is not registered as such neither before the Invima nor before any other official or commercial source. Out of the biological reference products with biosimilars, twelve have regulated price and seven have been authorized at least once via court ruling. Conclusions: Although the regulations are progressive in relation to the access to biosimilars and, consequently, to their biological pioneers, the system still has legal, availability and information barriers that undermine the protection and effectiveness of the right to health.

Resumo Introdução: este artigo apresenta uma análise sobre medicamentos biossimilares na Colômbia com vista a estabelecer se existe um consumo informado respeito destes fármacos, tendo em conta a qualidade e quantidade de informação que circula em relação com a sua disponibilidade e acesso econômico (preços). Desenvolvimento: o tipo de estudo é qualitativo com um desenho documental a partir da revisão em bases de dados como Pubmed, Scopus, Scielo, Vlex e Redalyc, bases de informação de registros sanitários de agências reguladoras de medicamentos (FDA, EMA e Invima) e o Sistema de Informação de Vademecum Med Informática. Um dos biossimilares autorizados em FDA e 4 da EMA, se encontram registrados no Invima, no entanto são mais os biossimilares não autorizados nem na FDA nem na EMA que se encontram registrados no Invima, os quais ainda não aparecem com esta classificação de biossimilares nem na agência reguladora colombiana, nem em nenhum outro meio oficial ou comercial. Dos medicamentos biológicos de referência destes biossimilares, 12 têm controle de preços e 7 têm sido autorizados pelo menos uma vez via judicial aos usuários do sistema. Conclusões: se bem a regulamentação tem sido de grande avanço em relação com o acesso a biossimilares e, consequentemente, a seus biológicos pioneiros, o sistema ainda tem barreiras jurídicas, de informação, disponibilidade e acesso que dificultam a proteção e efetividade do direito à saúde da população em termos de um consumo informado dos mesmos.

Does nurses' role, health or symptoms influence their personal use of ingestible complementary and alternative medicines?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of work-related characteristics, health, health behaviours and symptoms on ingestible biologically-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) use within the Australian nursing and midwifery workforce. BACKGROUND: CAM use is widespread worldwide, but there is little research into nurses' and midwives' personal use of ingestible CAM in Australia. METHODS: An online survey in 2014-15 used validated instruments and items to examine use of ingestible biologically-based CAM (herbs, foods and vitamins, minerals, amino acids, enzymes and other supplements), and the health and work-related characteristics of 5041 nurses and midwives recruited through the New South Wales Nurses and Midwives Association and professional networks. RESULTS: A small proportion of nurses (6.8%) identified as personal CAM users. Most were female, older, worked in foundational roles (frontline Registered and Enrolled Nurses/Midwives) and used one CAM, most commonly a multivitamin, although Vitamin D, Fish Oil, Calcium and Glucosamine±Chondroitin were also common. In comparison to non-users, CAM users were less likely to take sick days or indulge in risky drinking, but more likely to be symptomatic (with stiff joints, bodily/joint pain, severe tiredness, allergies, indigestion/heartburn), diagnosed with osteoarthritis and to adhere to healthy diet recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed a credible pattern of front line workers with physically demanding workloads that impact their physical health and are linked to frequent symptoms, using CAM treatments and achieving some success in being able to continue working and avoid sickness absence. Further investigation is warranted to protect and maintain the health of the nursing and midwifery workforce.

Biosimilar uptake by British local formularies: a cross sectional study.

Background Biological medicines are starting to lose their patent protection, so similar, inexact copies (biosimilars) are being developed and licensed. The high acquisition costs of biologics for healthcare providers could be reduced by switching to biosimilars, thus alleviating budgetary pressures and increasing patient access. Therefore, the acceptance of biosimilars by prescribers in Great Britain (GB; England, Scotland, Wales) needs to be described and understood. Objective To determine uptake of the first wave of biosimilars (somatropin, epoetin, filgrastim) by local formularies (lists of preferred medicines for prescribing in local healthcare settings). Settings This study targeted local formularies in GB. Method In November 2014, local formularies (medicines formularies of Acute Trusts and Health Boards in GB) were screened for their approach to listing of biologics and their biosimilars as well as recommendations on usage of these pharmaceuticals. Main Outcomes Measures Listing frequencies of biosimilars. Results One hundred and forty-six British local formularies were screened. Amongst the 80% of formularies in which brand names were specified, biosimilar filgrastim was the most frequently listed when compared to the other targeted biosimilars. Biosimilars were listed in preference to reference biologic medicine in 49% of local formularies for filgrastim, 11% for somatropin and in only 6% for epoetin. Conclusion Although the market for biosimilars can act in parallel to the generic market, their uptake measured using local British formularies was less than what is expected given that the British market for medicines has a strong focus on generics. Finally, geographical variability within GB requires further investigation.

Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: The package leaflet included in the packaging of all medicinal products plays an important role in the transmission of medicine-related information to patients. Therefore, in 2009, the European Commission published readability guidelines to try to ensure that the information contained in the package leaflet is understood by patients. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to calculate and compare the readability levels and length (number of words) of the package leaflets for biological medicines in 2007, 2010, and 2013. METHODS: The sample of this study included 36 biological medicine package leaflets that were downloaded from the European Medicines Agency website in three different years: 2007, 2010, and 2013. The readability of the selected package leaflets was obtained using the following readability formulas: SMOG grade, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, and Szigriszt's perspicuity index. The length (number of words) of the package leaflets was also measured. Afterwards, the relationship between these quantitative variables (three readability indexes and length) and categorical (or qualitative) variables were analyzed. The categorical variables were the year when the package leaflet was downloaded, the package leaflet section, type of medicine, year of authorization of biological medicine, and marketing authorization holder. RESULTS: The readability values of all the package leaflets exceeded the sixth-grade reading level, which is the recommended value for health-related written materials. No statistically significant differences were found between the three years of study in the readability indexes, although differences were observed in the case of the length (P=.002), which increased over the study period. When the relationship between readability indexes and length and the other variables was analyzed, statistically significant differences were found between package leaflet sections (P<.001) and between the groups of medicine only with regard to the length over the three studied years (P=.002 in 2007, P=.007 in 2010, P=.009 in 2013). Linear correlation was observed between the readability indexes (SMOG grade and Flesch-Kincaid grade level: r(2)=.92; SMOG grade and Szigriszt's perspicuity index: r(2)=.81; Flesch-Kincaid grade level and Szigriszt's perspicuity index: r(2)=.95), but not between the readability indexes and the length (length and SMOG grade: r(2)=.05; length and Flesch-Kincaid grade level: r(2)=.03; length and Szigriszt's perspicuity index: r(2)=.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no improvement in the readability of the package leaflets studied between 2007 and 2013 despite the European Commission's 2009 guideline on the readability of package leaflets. The results obtained from the different readability formulas coincided from a qualitative point of view. Efforts to improve the readability of package leaflets for biological medicines are required to promote the understandability and accessibility of this online health information by patients and thereby contribute to the appropriate use of medicines and medicine safety.